In traditional SEO, ranking means identifying high-volume keywords and placing them strategically. That still matters. BUTTTT Interestingly NOT TO LLMs.
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and Claude don’t match exact strings. They interpret meaning through embeddings, turning your sentences into math that captures context, nuance, and relationships.
This means:
LLMs don’t care how many times you say a keyword. They care whether you understand the concept 🤯
Here's the deal: If you want to show up in AI results, you need to write for semantic understanding, not just search bots.
Keywords vs Concepts: What’s the Difference?
| SEO Keywords | LLM Concepts |
| Literal string matches | Semantic relationships |
| "Best productivity tools" | "Software that helps people work more efficiently" |
| "What is semantic SEO" | "Content strategies based on meaning, not strings" |
| Focused on search volume | Focused on meaning & context |
TL;DR: LLMs they connect ideas, not just phrases.
Why Concepts Win in the AI Age
LLMs are built on vector similarity. When a user asks a question, the model pulls content that is closest in meaning, not string match.
So you might rank in GPT’s brain even if:
- You don’t use the exact query
- Your phrasing is different but conceptually accurate
- Your page covers related terms and synonyms that reinforce your authority
That’s semantic SEO in action.
Here are 5 simple ways to write for how LLMs actually think:
- Go deep, not just broad: Define the idea, compare it, add examples, explain why it matters... LLMs reward depth — not surface-level summaries.
- Use synonyms + related phrasing: Think “semantic SEO,” “AI search,” “retrieval-based models.” These build a semantic neighborhood around your topic.
- Answer questions like a guide, not a marketer: Use question-style headers (e.g. “How does RAG work?”), and give direct, quotable answers.
- Internally link related concepts: If you write about LLM search, connect it to your content on RAG, prompt design, and semantic SEO. That’s how you build topical authority — and show up more often in AI answers.
- Be “vector-friendly”: Use strong verbs, clear nouns, and examples. LLMs convert your words into math - the clearer the meaning, the better the match.
By now, you know what LLMs reward: depth, clarity, and semantic understanding. But what do they ignore? Or worse, what do they filter out completely?
Here are 4 things to avoid if you want to show up in tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude:
Trap #1: Keyword tunnel vision
Repeating one string 12 times doesn’t help. It can confuse LLMs trained to map meaning, not patterns.
Trap #2: Thin content
If your article doesn’t explain relationships or context, it won’t show up when someone asks a real question.
Trap #3: Spray-and-pray listicles
You know the kind: 17 tools, zero explanation. AI tools skip shallow pages.
Trap #4: Copycat content
If your post says the same thing as 100 others, LLMs don’t cite you — they cite someone else who said it first or better.
So what does work?
We’ve structured our latest guide “From Backlinks to Data Depth: How LLMs Are Rewriting Content Authority” to reflect the kind of content that tends to perform well with LLMs:
✔️ Uses natural phrasing
✔️ Connects related ideas (semantic SEO, retrieval, embeddings)
✔️ Explains concepts clearly
✔️ Links to deeper support content
This is how LLMs “trust” your content — not by backlinks, but by semantic richness.
Want help creating content that’s built for AI visibility?
Starting at only $5k, you get to:
- Publish three evergreen content pieces on HackerNoon (with canonical tags)
- Translations into 76 languages for each of the three stories
- Advertise your product for a week on a targeted category